Twitter feminist find themselves in a predicament.
Some pieces of the story are missing.
Some cunt interrupted my conversation with @samambreen and when we told him to fuck off he called her a paki. Whole bus defended him.
— Ellen (@Ellwynnnnn) June 23, 2013
Livid that this happened, after a night of full fucking antifascism we run in to a shit eating racist cunt and a bus full of apologists.
— Ellen (@Ellwynnnnn) June 23, 2013
I smacked his piece of shit face and I would do it again. Fuck all those people, even the women, who told us to shut up and sit down.
— Ellen (@Ellwynnnnn) June 23, 2013
@nicola_blunders@SamAmbreen We are home and ok. I want that guy to die.
— Ellen (@Ellwynnnnn) June 23, 2013
If we ever go to war, I want @Ellwynnnnn by my side. We will kill all of them to keep each other safe. I love the way she walloped him!
— Sam DingDong Ambreen (@SamAmbreen) June 23, 2013
@SamAmbreen<3 Sometimes the only way is violent rebellion.
— Ellen (@Ellwynnnnn) June 23, 2013
This is why the world is fucked. All of the people on that bus were culpable for racial and misogynistic abuse. Where are the good people?
— Ellen (@Ellwynnnnn) June 23, 2013
Now sitting here, coming down from the adrenalin. Do I cry, throw up, laugh? Or make white privilege pay?
— Sam DingDong Ambreen (@SamAmbreen) June 23, 2013
@SmartCaz Good, he tried to hit me. Wonder how he'd have been with a gang on angry women.
— Ellen (@Ellwynnnnn) June 23, 2013
Some pieces of the story are missing.
- Why did the man feel the need to interrupt? Was he drunk or simply annoyed?
- When the man interrupted, did Ellen respond with an insult of her own?
- Did the "whole bus defend him" only after Ellen hit him?
- Did he attempt to hit Ellen before Ellen hit him?
- Why did other women tell Ellen and Sam to shut up and sit down?
Surely using racial epithets against strangers on a bus is a terrible thing to do.
Yet somehow it doesn't seem at all better to assault strangers and then make idle threats on Twitter about how you will "kill them all" and "make them pay".
The Twitter 'feminists' however don't need any more information. A woman hit a man, and provided her reasons for doing so. Skepticism about the correctness of her actions is just "mansplaining".
In this light, just what is 'social justice'?
When a woman hears a sexist joke, she is entitled to broadcast a photo of the culprit to everyone.
When a woman hears a man more or less admit to adultery, she can put it up on Facebook for all to judge.
Now, when a woman hears a man use racist language, she can straight up assault him.
If someone tells you they're into social justice, run the other way.
It's a dogmatic self-absorbed vigilante willing to do pretty much anything to make things more 'right' and 'just'.